When formulating my research topic, I had to avoid any bias
or preconceived opinions which led me to believe that this was also the manner
in which our research paper was to be written.
I was wrong. Our research paper
is really more of a thesis in which we have a point which we try to prove,
which is not what our research proposal was supposed to reflect, hence my
confusion. I think it was for the best
because I did my best to approach the research topic with as much objectivity
as I possibly could and treat the subject, not as a point I was trying to
prove, but as a mystery I was trying to solve.
This meant that for every source I studied in support, I had to study a
source that was against. For every point,
a counter point. Objectivity is usually
not difficult given that my mind is always trying to understand both sides of a
topic because I believe that only when you can see a subject from all angles
can you really say you understand it. In
the end, after all the sources have been studied, I must draw a conclusion
based on what I have found and decide on which side of the fence I will stand. My topic is the validity of animal
research. My conclusion.......will be revealed
on the final paper next week. :::cue the
dramatic music:::
No comments:
Post a Comment